Can I Sue for Malicious Prosecution? (2024)

While most lawsuits are filed for legitimate reasons, some individuals and businesses initiate cases simply to harm others and to make their lives more difficult. Such frivolous lawsuits can severely impact victims’ lives and could fall under malicious prosecution. Being wrongfully accused of a civil offense, or worse, a crime, can ruin your entire life and have dire consequences on your finances, reputation, and mental health.

If this has happened to you, Morgan & Morgan could help. You do not have to accept getting sued for no reason. Using the legal system simply to harm someone else is illegal. Therefore, you could have recourse and sue for malicious prosecution. Moreover, you could also qualify for damages such as loss of income, attorney’s fees, emotional distress, humiliation, and others. Get started now and contact us for a free case review to determine whether you have a malicious prosecution case.

What Is Malicious Prosecution?

According to the Legal Information Institute (LII), malicious prosecution is the act of filing a lawsuit without grounds and for an improper purpose. In other words, malicious prosecution occurs when one party knowingly initiates a baseless lawsuit against another with the intent to cause harm. Malicious prosecution can include criminal and civil charges alike.

Elements of a Malicious Prosecution Claim

The victim of malicious prosecution could file a tort claim and pursue damages. However, to win a malicious prosecution claim, the plaintiff (the person filing the lawsuit) must prove the following elements:

1. The Original Lawsuit Was Terminated in the Plaintiff’s Favor

The case must have been disposed of or won by the original defendant in a civil suit. A criminal case may qualify for malicious prosecution if dismissed, abandoned, rejected by a jury, or concluded in favor of the defendant.

2. There Was No Probable Cause

The plaintiff has to prove that the defendant never had a case to begin with and filed the lawsuit frivolously simply to inflict harm.

3. The Defendant Pursued the Lawsuit Maliciously

The plaintiff must show that the defendant pursued the previous case with malicious intent or improper purpose.

4. The Plaintiff Suffered Damages

The plaintiff also has to show that they suffered actual damages due to the improper prior lawsuit, such as attorney’s fees, wage losses, reputational damage, and others.

Criminal Cases

You could sue someone for malicious prosecution if they have brought groundless criminal charges against you. Other examples of when you could have a case can include:

  • A police officer filing an untrue report against you
  • A witness testifying falsely against you in court
  • Law enforcement arrest you without probable cause
  • A prosecutor targets you personally
  • The court finds you innocent

Anything proving that the original plaintiff filed the lawsuit without grounds, such as statements and witness testimony, can be used as evidence for malicious prosecution.

Civil Cases

Civil cases can involve a wide range of lawsuits, including:

  • Personal injury
  • Disputes over money and property
  • Disagreements over estate matters

Evidence for a baseless civil case can be circ*mstantial, such as the defendant’s behavior during the initial lawsuit.

Administrative Cases

Individuals and businesses can occasionally suffer harm from the wrongful use of administrative proceedings and regulatory processes. An example would be a client unwilling to pay a company for services rendered. The client files an official complaint with a state contractor board to avoid having to pay the business. The board then moves to punish the business by fining it or revoking its license to operate. If the business wins the administrative case, it can then move forward with a lawsuit for malicious prosecution.

The Original Lawsuit Must Have Been Dismissed

Malicious prosecution claims are designed to stop frivolous litigation. However, the courts have set the bar high to prevent malicious prosecution cases from becoming baseless and frivolous themselves. For example, if the original lawsuit concluded with a settlement agreement between the parties, a malicious prosecution lawsuit is generally not possible. Likewise, if a person was convicted of criminal charges, they cannot usually sue for malicious prosecution. To have a legal claim for malicious prosecution, the initial lawsuit must have been dismissed in favor of the defendant.

What Constitutes Malice in Legal Disputes?

According to the LII, in a legal context, malice is the intention to commit an unlawful act without excuse or justification. Arresting and prosecuting someone on discriminatory grounds or due to holding a grudge, for example, can constitute malice. Filing criminal charges to prosecute a person with the intent of harassing them, frightening them, or damaging their reputation can also amount to malice. However, a plaintiff does not always have to prove malice directly to have a case. Malice is generally implied when there is no probable cause or justification for a lawsuit. Therefore, a frivolous lawsuit without a reasonable cause could qualify for malicious prosecution.

How Morgan & Morgan Can Help

As America’s largest personal injury law firm, we have an army of lawyers, investigators, and legal team members ready and willing to fight for you and work on your case.

  • Determine whether you have a legal case for malicious prosecution
  • Help you navigate the legal system
  • File a malicious prosecution lawsuit on your behalf
  • Present evidence for your damages
  • Represent you at the legal proceedings
  • Present your case powerfully at trial
  • Negotiate a fair settlement with the defendant

At Morgan & Morgan, we passionately fight against injustice and have helped thousands of harmed clients receive the compensation they deserve. Over the last three decades, our tenacious attorneys have recovered more than $20 billion in damages for our clients. We could help you too. Morgan & Morgan can match you up with an attorney specializing in malicious prosecution to give you the best chance of achieving the maximum recovery in your case. Most importantly, when we handle your case, you will receive the time, attention, and compassion you deserve.

You Could Receive Compensation With a Malicious Prosecution Lawsuit

If you sue for malicious prosecution, you could recover compensation and punitive damages from the defendant. The types of damages you can recover will depend on your specific case and on whether you were prosecuted with a criminal or civil lawsuit, but can include compensation for:

  • Loss of reputation
  • Loss of credit
  • Humiliation
  • Emotional distress
  • Loss of time and lost wages due to incarceration
  • Injury to health
  • Deprivation of society with family
  • Money spent on defending groundless civil or criminal charges

You could also recover considerable punitive damages, particularly if your reputation was publicly harmed and you lost business revenue, clients, and income. In such cases, the courts might impose significant punitive damages to penalize the defendant and punish them for their misconduct. Since proof of the defendant’s intent is required to win a malicious prosecution lawsuit, punitive damages are frequently awarded to plaintiffs who qualify for compensatory awards.

Can I Sue for Malicious Prosecution? (2024)

FAQs

Can I Sue for Malicious Prosecution? ›

Criminal Cases

What is the burden of proof for malicious prosecution? ›

Since a malicious prosecution case is a type of civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is a preponderance of the evidence.

How hard is it to win a malicious prosecution case? ›

A malicious prosecution case can be difficult to prove, but with a few key elements it can be won in court. First, it must be clear that the defendant did not have probable cause to bring the action.

What must a plaintiff show to successfully sue for malicious prosecution? ›

What must a plaintiff show to sue for malicious prosecution? To sue for malicious prosecution, you must show that criminal or civil proceedings were initiated against you or continued without probable cause and that the case against you terminated in your favor.

What are the consequences of malicious prosecution? ›

In either case, the plaintiff may claim compensatory and sometimes punitive damages. Punitive damages are designed to punish egregious behavior. Compensatory damages consist of the actual damages that were a direct result of the malicious prosecution.

How to prove malice in malicious prosecution? ›

Actual malice, or malice in fact, may be established by showing that prosecutor's action was prompted by ill will, malevolence, grudge, spite, wicked intention, or conscious disregard of rights of another.

How to prove malicious intent? ›

that the defendant acted primarily for a purpose other than succeeding on the merits of the claim; that the underlying case harmed the plaintiff; and. that the defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's harm.

What is the largest settlement for malicious prosecution? ›

▸ $36,000,000 award against Cook County sheriff's police who framed four innocent African American men – Kenny Adams, Dennis Williams, Verneal Jimerson and Willie Raines (the Ford Heights Four), sending two to death row, by suppressing evidence which exonerated them. This is the largest settlement of its kind to date.

How hard is it to prove actual malice? ›

Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.

Can a cop be sued for malicious prosecution? ›

But immunity under section 821.6 “ 'is dependent on how the injury is caused. ' ” (Asgari, at p. 757.) We went on to explain that “[u]nder California law, a police officer may be held liable for false arrest and false imprisonment, but not for malicious prosecution.” (Ibid.)

How do you deal with malicious prosecution? ›

If you sue for malicious prosecution, you could recover compensation and punitive damages from the defendant. The types of damages you can recover will depend on your specific case and on whether you were prosecuted with a criminal or civil lawsuit, but can include compensation for: Loss of reputation. Loss of credit.

What 3 things must a plaintiff prove in a negligence case? ›

To win in a negligence lawsuit, the victim must establish 4 elements: (1) the wrongdoer owed a duty to the victim, (2) the wrongdoer breached the duty, (3) the breach caused the injury (4) the victim suffered damages.

What is a counter suit for a frivolous lawsuit? ›

In legal terms, this is known as a “counterclaim” or “counter-assertion.” If the original lawsuit is deemed frivolous and lacks legal merit, the defendant may seek damages or other remedies through a counterclaim, asserting that the plaintiff's initial legal action was without proper legal basis, causing harm or ...

What is the common law of malicious prosecution? ›

A malicious prosecution occurs when a police officer or other government official causes criminal charges to be filed against a person when the official knows probable cause is lacking and the charges are filed because of personal animosity, bias, or some other reason outside the interests of justice.

Is malicious prosecution a violation of civil rights? ›

Malicious prosecution

This is a violation of a person's civil rights to liberty and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Essentially, malicious prosecution is a baseless accusation brought against someone in order to harass or intimidate them – an arrest without probable cause.

What is abuse of process malicious prosecution? ›

While abuse of process refers to using the legal system to achieve a goal other than its original intent – such as to hurt the plaintiff or cause an unnecessary delay or additional expense — malicious prosecution refers to wrongfully filing charges against an individual or entity for the sole purpose of causing them ...

Who has the burden of proof for actual malice? ›

The actual malice standard requires that the plaintiff in a defamation case prove that the defendant intentionally spread false and defamatory information. The plaintiff can prove this by showing that the defendant knew that he or she was wrong or that the defendant acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

What is the burden of proof in a criminal prosecution? ›

Burden of Proof

The standard of proof in a criminal trial gives the prosecutor a much greater burden than the plaintiff in a civil trial. The defendant must be found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt,” which means the evidence must be so strong that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime.

What are the elements of malicious prosecution? ›

Like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution.

What is the burden of proof on the prosecution judgment? ›

Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Patricia Veum II

Last Updated:

Views: 6350

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (64 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Patricia Veum II

Birthday: 1994-12-16

Address: 2064 Little Summit, Goldieton, MS 97651-0862

Phone: +6873952696715

Job: Principal Officer

Hobby: Rafting, Cabaret, Candle making, Jigsaw puzzles, Inline skating, Magic, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Patricia Veum II, I am a vast, combative, smiling, famous, inexpensive, zealous, sparkling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.